In view of that answer, which is greatly confusing to me, it is clear that the effort is not simply to eliminate the stay language that Senator Coburn was successful in inserting in the Judiciary Committee, but also the injunction language that is in the existing statute. I don't know that you can read it any other way. If the Senator from Wisconsin would like to clarify, I will certainly stand to be corrected.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
The first thing we've got to do is have a conventional capability which is so dominant that no party would ever consider a nuclear attack against the United States.
Mr. Chairman, Representative Jacobs, the fact is that our current system has deteriorated and aged to the point that we wouldn't be confident in the deterrent value of it on out into the future.
It's enough that it's opportunistic. In other words, we're in a conflict with one, and the other sees that this is an opportunity.
One of the things that we noticed in this endeavor is there is a great attitude among the military, among the Defense Department generally in being able to succeed at a mission.
Other voices in this conversation
