I noted that one of the subjects of discussion in the colloquy between the Senator from Maryland and the Senator from Tennessee had to do with the President's authority under this legislation to waive certain provisions, important provisions, because they deal with a question of whether or not an item that is on the control list--so-called commerce control list--should be waived or whether there should be a waiver of either the embedded product rule or the foreign availability and mass market rule under sections 204 and 211 of the act. The point was made by the Senator from Maryland that if there were a problem with one of the dual-use items on the list, the President had the authority to waive that. Therefore, those of us who have concerns about the legislation need not be concerned. The Senator from Wyoming made the further point that in this case we didn't want to turn this matter over to the bureaucrats so we gave the authority directly to the President. I appreciate the sentiment behind those vows. There is a problem with them however. That is, the President, with all of his other responsibilities, can't possibly exercise this authority without the help of the so-called bureaucrats, without the help of a staff. I have in my hand just a partial list of the commerce control list items. It specifically says at the top: This index is not an exhaustive list of the controlled items. I haven't bothered to count these. There are hundreds and hundreds of items.…
Jon Kyl: “I noted that one of the subjects of discussion in the colloquy between the Senator from Maryland and the Senator from…”
On the recordSeptember 4, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the President's authority under legislation related to the commerce control list.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
Dec 13, 2018
I would like to make just a couple of comments on my friend's having left the Senate and with respect to the remarks that he just made. The Senate has had some very good people over the years, and currently, but none have been more…
Nov 14, 2023
The first thing we've got to do is have a conventional capability which is so dominant that no party would ever consider a nuclear attack against the United States.
Nov 14, 2023
One of our recommendations concerns ways that we could potentially mitigate the risk of a deterrence gap.
Nov 14, 2023
we're obviously not starting anything, we're playing catch up, and it's going to be a pretty tough job to catch up





