On the recordMarch 19, 2002
what those two letters say is that the Kyl amendment should be adopted and the Bingaman amendment should lose. They are echoing the sentiments of a lot of other groups both in the private and public sectors. I have put in the Record some other letters from the public sector and associations that strongly support the Kyl amendment. I wish to respond to some of the comments from colleagues that have been made in response to my presentation. My colleague from North Dakota made the point that we should have a national energy policy just like the Clean Air Act and that is why we need a national energy bill. There is a difference between a national policy and a Federal policy. We do have national problems, but not all national problems are best solved by a Federal solution. In this case, we have a combination because we have clearly decided that the Federal Government does need to be directly involved in the national energy policy debate, but we do not say --none of us says--the Federal Government should take it all over; it is a Federal problem; therefore, we have a Federal solution. Most of what we do as a nation we do as private sector operatives, as State and local governments, and then, of course, the U.S. Government does a fair amount of directing and financing of programs, but clearly we cannot run everything from Washington, DC.…
Source
govinfo.gov




