So there is a requirement that the Government, with some degree of burden, prove that the individual knew that national security could be harmed above and beyond the fact that he knew he was leaking classified information.
Kyl emphasizes the government's burden of proof in cases of leaking classified information.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
I couldn't agree with the chairman more. I applaud the chairman and the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee for going to the President, along with Secretary of Defense Mattis, and talking about the need to continue with his…
It's enough that it's opportunistic. In other words, we're in a conflict with one, and the other sees that this is an opportunity.
Mr. Chairman, Representative Jacobs, the fact is that our current system has deteriorated and aged to the point that we wouldn't be confident in the deterrent value of it on out into the future.
One of our recommendations concerns ways that we could potentially mitigate the risk of a deterrence gap.
Other voices in this conversation
