We started this session of Congress, I think, on a fairly high note of bipartisanship. While there have been some recent events that may have detracted from that, I think most of us would like to proceed with as much bipartisanship as possible. Part of this, of course, concerns relationships between the Congress and the President. Since the majority in the Senate and the President are of different parties, that may be a little more difficult, but I have a suggestion today which I hope will enable us to move in that direction. The President has a number of nominees, executive branch nominees, there are a few legislative branch nominees that require our actions, and then there are some judicial nominees. I hope in a real spirit of bipartisanship we can get those nominees cleared; that is to say, the Senate can confirm the President's nominations and the personnel that he needs in the executive branch to get his work done, and that we can confirm the judges the courts need. These are people who need to be put into place so our country can move forward for all of the American people.
On the recordJuly 16, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for bipartisanship in confirming presidential nominees.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
Nov 27, 2018
today, along with several other colleagues from the Senate, I wrote to the President on the subject of the possible extension of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or New START. Several people have been encouraging the President to…
Nov 14, 2023
Our responsibility is to be straightforward with you all. You're the ones that appointed us, you're the ones that we answer to.
Nov 14, 2023
Yes, Mr. Chairman, Representative Jacobs, the whole point is if the adversary believes that our system no longer functions, then they don't need to try to wipe it out at the beginning of a conflict.





