I hope my colleague is not suggesting that, under no circumstances, should the Senate ever change a treaty so that the other party to the treaty would have to, in effect--well, the Senate would never be able to change a treaty. Put it that way.
The speaker is discussing the Senate's ability to change treaties.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
The first thing we've got to do is have a conventional capability which is so dominant that no party would ever consider a nuclear attack against the United States.
I would like to make just a couple of comments on my friend's having left the Senate and with respect to the remarks that he just made. The Senate has had some very good people over the years, and currently, but none have been more…
We conclude that the strategic deterrent is not just a nuclear deterrent, it is a combination of conventional and nuclear.
Other voices in this conversation
