Political Quotes

On the recordJune 4, 1996
There are a lot of arguments made by Russians themselves that relate to the cost of continuing to maintain an arsenal. My guess would be that the Russians would at least want to draw their arsenal down to the levels called for in START I, because it is very expensive to maintain that degree of arsenal. There is also a counterargument made that they might not agree to the START II Treaty that we have already ratified because of the high cost of compliance in bringing those warheads down. The Senator from Georgia has been a leader in the United States in trying to provide assistance to the Russians to enable them to afford to do that. It is an expensive proposition.
Said by
Jon Kyl
Republican · Arizona

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the financial implications of Russia's nuclear arsenal and treaties during Senate debate.

Share

More from Jon Kyl

Nov 26, 2018

As a matter of personal privilege, let me comment, for just a moment, as a former member of this Commission.

congress.gov
Oct 9, 2018

The responsibilities between the three of you are enormous, and they relate everything to our country's national security.

congress.gov
Nov 14, 2023

The first thing we've got to do is have a conventional capability which is so dominant that no party would ever consider a nuclear attack against the United States.

congress.gov
Nov 14, 2023

It makes our planning much more difficult.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation