On the recordFebruary 10, 2003
There are two aspects of this nomination of Miguel Estrada that should catch our attention. The first has to do with the qualifications of this extraordinary American. The second has to do with the process by which he is being considered. If we are not careful, this body could set a very bad precedent. If Senators actually decide to filibuster the nomination of Miguel Estrada, something I understand is being considered by the leadership on the other side, if the decision were made to filibuster him and his nomination failed as a result, it would be the first time in the history of the Senate. It would drastically change the way nominations for high judicial office are considered by the Senate, essentially substituting a 60-vote majority required for confirmation for the 50-vote majority that has heretofore been the standard.
Source
govinfo.gov




