That is exactly correct. Let's go to the other side of the coin. The President's own Attorney General could appoint someone who very aggressively followed his policies, and the Senate would have nothing to say about it.
Discussing the implications of presidential appointments during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
We have to make decisions now to make sure that we have the capacity to build whatever we're going to need to build.
It's enough that it's opportunistic. In other words, we're in a conflict with one, and the other sees that this is an opportunity.
One of our recommendations concerns ways that we could potentially mitigate the risk of a deterrence gap.
Other voices in this conversation
