I do not see why any foreign law or any religious law could or should supplant U.S. law.
Editor's note · Context
Kyl emphasizes that U.S. law should not be replaced by foreign or religious laws.
Share & report
More from Jon Kyl
The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from South Carolina (Mr. DeMint) and the Senator from Illinois (Mr. Kirk). The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber desiring to vote? The result was…
Mr. President, this is the first time I have had the opportunity to address my colleagues on the Senate floor since I was appointed to fill the seat of our late friend and colleague John McCain. I appreciate the opportunity to speak on a…
we have to make decisions now to make sure that we have the capacity to build whatever we're going to need to build.
Mr. President, the chairman of the Armed Services Committee is exactly correct. You could illustrate the same things with charts relating to our Air Force, to our Army, to our Marine Corps--all elements of our services. It is not just in…





