A consensus emerged during the 1990s with regard to the national security of the United States. That consensus was and remains that the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction-- nuclear, chemical and biological--and their means of delivery constitute the most important threat to our national security. There is also widespread acknowledgment that a number of rogue nations, and particularly China, represent the new national security challenge for the United States. Yet, this body, the U.S. Senate, is about to pass with overwhelming support a major piece of legislation that stands in direct contradiction to the objectives of U.S. national security policy--to limit the spread of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery. This is not hyperbole; it is a simple statement of fact. I acknowledge that the administration has endorsed S. 149. A campaign pledge has been kept. But the long-term ramifications of the vote we are about to take should not be underestimated.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about national security and the implications of legislation S. 149.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
I am informed that it is necessary for me to insert into the Record of the proceedings the resignation letter that I sent to Governor Doug Ducey of Arizona on December 12, 2018; therefore, I ask unanimous consent that this letter be…
I just want to thank my colleague, the majority leader, for his comments about me. He asked if there were differences between the time that I served before and this most recent time, and I must say that the thing that I have noticed most…
we're obviously not starting anything, we're playing catch up, and it's going to be a pretty tough job to catch up
We conclude that the strategic deterrent is not just a nuclear deterrent, it is a combination of conventional and nuclear.





