A viable triad at a minimum, per se, has to include nuclear capability or it is not part of our nuclear triad, right? And what I am saying here is that the administration is not assuring us that the long-range bomber will be nuclear capable. So maybe we have a dyad now, not a triad.
The speaker is discussing the nuclear capabilities of the U.S. military and the implications for national security.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
As a matter of personal privilege, let me comment, for just a moment, as a former member of this Commission.
The responsibilities between the three of you are enormous, and they relate everything to our country's national security.
The first thing we've got to do is have a conventional capability which is so dominant that no party would ever consider a nuclear attack against the United States.
Other voices in this conversation
