For those who would condemn others in hateful language for doing that, that would not be--while that speech would be permitted, it would not be speech that--well, that speech would be permitted, but would you condemn--
Jon Kyl: “For those who would condemn others in hateful language for doing that, that would not be--while that speech would be…”
Editor's note · Context
Kyl questions the morality of condemning others for their faith choices.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
The first thing we've got to do is have a conventional capability which is so dominant that no party would ever consider a nuclear attack against the United States.
One of our recommendations concerns ways that we could potentially mitigate the risk of a deterrence gap.
Mr. Chairman, Representative Jacobs, the fact is that our current system has deteriorated and aged to the point that we wouldn't be confident in the deterrent value of it on out into the future.
One of the things that we noticed in this endeavor is there is a great attitude among the military, among the Defense Department generally in being able to succeed at a mission.





