Mr. President, what I said before was, on four separate occasions over just a couple of months, the administration had assured Members of the Senate that it would not use food aid as an enticement to the North Koreans to come to the negotiating table. Here are direct quotations from the State Department, comments such as ``had no intention of rewarding them for their actions that their government has already agreed to take.'' Reaffirmed, ``There are no financial incentives for North Korea to meet the precepts or engage in talks.'' Deputy Secretary of State Bill Burns, ``To be clear, the Administration will not provide any financial incentives to Pyongyang. . . .'' et cetera, on the negotiations. And further that ``any engagement with North Korea will not be used as a mechanism to funnel financial or other rewards to Pyongyang.'' We also heard media reports and asked them about them. They said no: These media reports are not accurate. U.S. policy toward North Korea has not changed. We have no intention of rewarding North Korea-- And so on. And a mere 3 weeks later, we do exactly the opposite. That is why a waiver for the President to say otherwise does not do any good and why I urge support---- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator's time has expired.
Share & report
More from Jon Kyl
The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from South Carolina (Mr. DeMint) and the Senator from Illinois (Mr. Kirk). The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber desiring to vote? The result was…
Mr. President, I know that the Democratic leader is scheduled to speak next, but if there is a minute that I could take in between, I just wanted to comment on my colleague who spoke yesterday, Senator Collins. I had wanted to come to the…
Mr. President, today, along with several other colleagues from the Senate, I wrote to the President on the subject of the possible extension of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or New START. Several people have been encouraging the…
Mr. President, the chairman of the Armed Services Committee is exactly correct. You could illustrate the same things with charts relating to our Air Force, to our Army, to our Marine Corps--all elements of our services. It is not just in…





