Jon Kyl: “You said it was 'utterly lacking in any legal principle.' That's a pretty tough criticism for a Supreme Court decision.”

One of our recommendations concerns ways that we could potentially mitigate the risk of a deterrence gap.

That's why we say that has to be decided now.

Our responsibility is to be straightforward with you all. You're the ones that appointed us, you're the ones that we answer to.

It's enough that it's opportunistic. In other words, we're in a conflict with one, and the other sees that this is an opportunity.