Political Quotes

On the recordNovember 1, 2011
The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Arizona (Mr. McCain) and the Senator from North Carolina (Mr. Burr). The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber desiring to vote? The result was announced--yeas 13, nays 85, as follows: [Rollcall Vote No. 189 Leg.] YEAS--13 Coburn Corker Cornyn DeMint Graham Hatch Hutchison Inhofe Johnson (WI) Kyl Lee Paul Toomey NAYS--85 Akaka Alexander Ayotte Barrasso Baucus Begich Bennet Bingaman Blumenthal Blunt Boozman Boxer Brown (MA) Brown (OH) Cantwell Cardin Carper Casey Chambliss Coats Cochran Collins Conrad Coons Crapo Durbin Enzi Feinstein Franken Gillibrand Grassley Hagan Harkin Heller Hoeven Inouye Isakson Johanns Johnson (SD) Kerry Kirk Klobuchar Kohl Landrieu Lautenberg Leahy Levin Lieberman Lugar Manchin McCaskill McConnell Menendez Merkley Mikulski Moran Murkowski Murray Nelson (NE) Nelson (FL) Portman Pryor Reed Reid Risch Roberts Rockefeller Rubio Sanders Schumer Sessions Shaheen Shelby Snowe Stabenow Tester Thune Udall (CO) Udall (NM) Vitter Warner Webb Whitehouse Wicker Wyden NOT VOTING--2 Burr McCain The amendment (No. 800) was rejected. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Wisconsin.
Said by
Jon Kyl
Republican · Arizona
Source
govinfo.gov
Nov 1, 2011

Share

More from Jon Kyl

Nov 14, 2023

The first thing we've got to do is have a conventional capability which is so dominant that no party would ever consider a nuclear attack against the United States.

congress.gov
Nov 14, 2023

The best way to deter a nuclear conflict is to deter a conventional conflict with the nuclear powers.

congress.gov
Dec 18, 2018

let me speak a moment about this act. The sponsors, as you have just heard, and supporters like Senator Portman have proceeded with very good intentions. As you just heard, a compelling case for finding ways to help people who have made a…

govinfo.gov
Nov 14, 2023

One of our recommendations concerns ways that we could potentially mitigate the risk of a deterrence gap.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation