On the recordApril 18, 2005
One of the reasons I believe our bill has more support is that it is more likely to become law, whether it is a stand-alone provision that relates only to agricultural workers or is part of a broader kind of immigration reform. I do not think many people believe the House of Representatives is going to pass a bill with amnesty, so we are trying to be practical about it. We would like to get something done, not simply run an ideological position up the flag pole in order to get a vote on it here in the Senate. That is why the American Farm Bureau is so strongly in support of our legislation and in opposition to our colleagues' legislation. I ask unanimous consent to have printed in the Record a letter from the American Farm Bureau Federation dated April 13 to the Presiding Officer and myself. There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in the Record, as follows: American Farm Bureau Federation, Washington, DC, April 13, 2005. Hon. Saxby Chambliss, U.S. Senate, Washington, DC. Hon. Jon L. Kyl, U.S. Senate, Washington, DC. Dear Senators Chambliss and Kyl: The American Farm Bureau Federation strongly supports the Chambliss-Kyl Amendment and urges its adoption when it is considered on the Senate floor. This amendment would provide U.S. agriculture a clear, simple, timely and efficient H-2a program to fill seasonal and temporary jobs for which there is a limited U.S. labor supply.…
Source
govinfo.gov




