I agree with the point in the first year there is a greater benefit for individuals but a higher cost to the Government. Would the Senator continue the timeline over the next 10 years?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of a policy over a decade.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
I am informed that it is necessary for me to insert into the Record of the proceedings the resignation letter that I sent to Governor Doug Ducey of Arizona on December 12, 2018; therefore, I ask unanimous consent that this letter be…
I certainly appreciate this comment by the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee because the Secretaries of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs have all said our strategic deterrent has to be our No. 1 priority. Why is…
we're obviously not starting anything, we're playing catch up, and it's going to be a pretty tough job to catch up
It's enough that it's opportunistic. In other words, we're in a conflict with one, and the other sees that this is an opportunity.





