Since we have had this discussion, let me take no more than 4 minutes. I will join the Senator in the pride he has for the Giants and their wonderful victory in my home State of Arizona yesterday. I hope a good time was had by all, including those who had their string broken. I do wish to respond because there have been a couple suggestions made I think that are inaccurate. We are not going to come in tomorrow and have the prayer by the Chaplain and do nothing. I hope that debate on the stimulus package is not perceived by people as doing nothing. All of us, almost all of us I think, everybody on the Democratic side voted to take up the stimulus bill. That is what we voted on an hour ago. We voted to take up the stimulus bill. Now we are on the stimulus bill. I have not had a chance to speak on it yet. I would like to do that. Tomorrow is my opportunity. The majority leader is the one who said there would be no votes on the stimulus package tomorrow, not the Senator from Kentucky, the minority leader. So the fact that we are not voting on the stimulus bill tomorrow has nothing to do with Republican delay. It is a commitment made by the majority leader. I have no problem with the commitment. There are people out campaigning. But that was the majority leader's decision not to vote on the stimulus bill tomorrow. As I said, we voted for cloture for the House bill. I am happy to vote on the House bill.
On the recordFebruary 4, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the Senate's schedule and debate regarding the stimulus package.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
Nov 14, 2023
One of our recommendations concerns ways that we could potentially mitigate the risk of a deterrence gap.
Dec 18, 2018
I couldn't agree with the chairman more. I applaud the chairman and the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee for going to the President, along with Secretary of Defense Mattis, and talking about the need to continue with his…
Nov 14, 2023
The first thing we've got to do is have a conventional capability which is so dominant that no party would ever consider a nuclear attack against the United States.
Nov 14, 2023
It's enough that it's opportunistic. In other words, we're in a conflict with one, and the other sees that this is an opportunity.





