Our amendment makes clear that the goal of our Armed Forces is to have the kind of time in theater and dwell times that our military has sought to achieve and that are sought to be achieved by the amendment but that it is a goal rather than an absolute fixed requirement that becomes the policy of the U.S. military determined by congressional action. The reason for that is twofold. By mandating a certain policy for deployment time or dwell time, the Congress is engaged in the most explicit micromanaging of what is obviously a function for the Commander in Chief and military commanders to perform. The deployments of troops are clearly Commander in Chief obligations and responsibilities. This is not something Members of Congress are knowledgeable about or would have the ability to dictate in any responsible fashion. As a result, for us to adopt a mandatory policy here would be the height of micromanagement. It also, of course, would be unconstitutional.
Jon Kyl: “Our amendment makes clear that the goal of our Armed Forces is to have the kind of time in theater and dwell times that…”
On the recordJuly 11, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to military deployment and congressional authority.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
Nov 14, 2023
we're obviously not starting anything, we're playing catch up, and it's going to be a pretty tough job to catch up
Dec 18, 2018
I couldn't agree with the chairman more. I applaud the chairman and the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee for going to the President, along with Secretary of Defense Mattis, and talking about the need to continue with his…
Oct 5, 2018
I know that the Democratic leader is scheduled to speak next, but if there is a minute that I could take in between, I just wanted to comment on my colleague who spoke yesterday, Senator Collins. I had wanted to come to the floor to speak…





