I simply want to point out and express my appreciation to the gentleman from Minnesota [Mr. Vento], my friend, for his candor in his remarks in support of this particular amendment. He said, and I quote quite directly, ``This leaves the power in the hands of the President.'' And indeed that is precisely what the proponents of this amendment want to do. They want to leave the power under the Antiquities Act in the hands of the President. Mr. Chairman, that might be a good idea and under prior Presidents probably was a good idea. But, regrettably, the most recent incident demonstrates that that power is awesome and can be, and in this case regrettably was, abused. Even if my colleagues do not think it was abused in this case, they ought to be concerned about the power of the President to act unilaterally; to, as he did in this case, ignore the Utah delegation; to, as he did in this case, ignore the Governor of Utah, who is sitting in a hotel in Washington, DC, desperately trying to see the President. I suggest that people who believe in sunshine, who believe in process, and who believe in the rule of law, should reject this amendment, because it leaves in the President's hands the power to unilaterally designate a national monument of 50,000 acres, as our bill would do, but to go beyond that and to designate 1.7 million, or 5 million, or 10 million, or 22 million, or, for that matter, 22 billion acres, and to ignore the Congress in doing that.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over presidential power under the Antiquities Act during a debate on an amendment.
Share
More from John Shadegg
Your idea is we should empower patients to be able to pick their plans and to be able to pick their doctors, which we could do by, number one, letting those Americans who can afford it but who don't get employer-provided care buy health…
Well, it seems to me that while we do not know what the quid pro quo was for any given deal, we know a couple of things: We know the insurance companies went in first and foremost and said, We want an individual mandate. We want the…
I kind of think the American people are fairly bright. I think they see through this. If you are deeming a bill passed in a rule, aren't you actually passing that bill and aren't you voting for that bill? And isn't this just a trick or a…
Wait, the gentleman's telling me that never before in Federal law have we ordered people to buy a particular product, that we don't do that in Federal law as a routine matter?





