Political Quotes

John Shadegg: “Well, I have had a number of people engage in debate. In Arizona we debated this measure. The opponents of it predicted…”

On the recordApril 21, 1998
Well, I have had a number of people engage in debate. In Arizona we debated this measure. The opponents of it predicted dire consequences. They said that this was an irresponsible measure, that we should never have a supermajority requirement, that we had always just had a simple majority. They even go so far, and you may have heard this in debate yourself, as to say it is un-American to require anything other than a simple majority. And yet the Founding Fathers when they drafted our Constitution inserted a number of supermajority requirements, and when you combine the supermajority requirements that are already in our Constitution, such as to ratify a treaty, with others that have been added----
Said by
John Shadegg
Arizona

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the debate over supermajority requirements in Arizona legislation.

Share

More from John Shadegg

Mar 16, 2010

Ah, so it's Republicans who oppose this bill that are the pals of the health insurance industry? I don't think so. And you're telling me that in the one State where we've already tried this, a mandate that you must buy health insurance…

govinfo.gov
Mar 16, 2010

Because of one word difference? One word difference. The Senate has already passed the Senate bill, the House has to pass that exact bill word for word. It can't have one word missing?

govinfo.gov
Mar 16, 2010

So the reason you wouldn't want to stand on the floor and vote for that Senate bill is not just because of the policy in it, it is because that bill will contain the Cornhusker Kickback, right?

govinfo.gov
Mar 16, 2010

Wait, the gentleman's telling me that never before in Federal law have we ordered people to buy a particular product, that we don't do that in Federal law as a routine matter?

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation