when we talk about 300 percent of the Federal poverty level or 400 percent of the Federal poverty level, the abuse of the program, can the gentleman tell us about how much money that means? We say this program is not directed just at poor or even, I like to say, nearly poor children. Poor children are supposed to be taken care of by Medicare. This is supposed to be for the near-poor.
John Shadegg: “when we talk about 300 percent of the Federal poverty level or 400 percent of the Federal poverty level, the abuse of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of federal poverty levels in relation to a specific program.
Share
More from John Shadegg
You know, it stuns me that you just said that, under current law in America, if you work for an employer who gives you health care through your employment, it's tax free. There's no income tax paid on it by your employer, no tax paid on it…
I think it is important to understand the burden that this legislation does place on our economy at a time when we ought to be focused on jobs. I know when I go home on the weekends, I encounter many of my constituents. I get to see them…
But wait. But wait. Without a 2,700-page bill, you couldn't hide the Cornhusker Kickback. You couldn't hide the Gator Aid. You couldn't hide the Louisiana Purchase. I haven't even gotten to all of them yet, but go ahead.
I believe most people across America know that we have been debating health care reform for almost a year now--actually, quite frankly, a little over a year now. And I think most Americans agree with me and probably with almost everybody…





