I am trying to understand this. So if the Medicare Advantage participants in Arizona who are having their Medicare Advantage cut, and the Medicare Advantage participants in Florida who are not, under the Gator Aid that Senator Bill Nelson cut, that special deal, having their Medicare Advantage cut, if the House only deems the bill passed, can they sue and can they win? Or will the courts say, well, no, no, no, your Congressman may have said he didn't vote for the bill, he just deemed it passed, but trust me, we, the courts say he did vote for the bill. And so Arizona taxpayers on Medicare Advantage lose out, Florida taxpayers because of Bill Nelson and the special deal he cut currently in the Senate bill, which you say can't have a word changed when it comes here, they win out. Pretty good deal. By the way, I look at some of these other deals, there is special funding for coal miners in Montana. There is just provision after provision. In North Dakota there are special provisions providing higher Medicare payments there. There are special provisions for Hawaii that apparently the two Hawaii Senators got in. There are special provisions for longshoremen in Oregon. You know, this thing looks to me like it is chockablock full of special deals for special Members, special Senators who say, well, you know, I want a special deal or I won't vote for it.
Editor's note · Context
Speaker Shadegg discusses disparities in Medicare Advantage provisions across states and concerns over special deals in legislation.
Share
More from John Shadegg
It will contain Gator Aid. It apparently contains $100 million for a local hospital in Connecticut that Chris Dodd got in. It contains $1.1 billion for Medicaid in Vermont and Massachusetts. I guess not Arizona or Texas. Our States didn't…
Or maybe even a small doctor's office. If their employer doesn't give them employer-paid health care coverage, here's what we do the little guy. Here's what we do to the least among us. We say, Oh, you really ought to be insured, but we're…
No, we don't force people to do that. I guess we do say that if you want to drive in some places, you have to buy auto insurance to insure against damage to somebody else. Right?
Your idea is we should empower patients to be able to pick their plans and to be able to pick their doctors, which we could do by, number one, letting those Americans who can afford it but who don't get employer-provided care buy health…





