As the gentleman understands the proposal being offered by Republicans, one of the key features is choice. That is, we allow people to pick from amongst a variety of plans that meet their own needs; and in addition at least it is my understanding that as the bill we passed and the legislation we are proposing and indeed the legislation being proposed by Governor Bush would give seniors the right to not only choose amongst various plans when they join but to make choices again down the line. If they are unhappy with the plan they pick, they could make a choice at a later point to switch plans. Is that not a feature?
John Shadegg: “As the gentleman understands the proposal being offered by Republicans, one of the key features is choice. That is, we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of choice in healthcare plans for seniors.
Share
More from John Shadegg
I kind of think the American people are fairly bright. I think they see through this. If you are deeming a bill passed in a rule, aren't you actually passing that bill and aren't you voting for that bill? And isn't this just a trick or a…
Because of one word difference? One word difference. The Senate has already passed the Senate bill, the House has to pass that exact bill word for word. It can't have one word missing?
Ah, so it's Republicans who oppose this bill that are the pals of the health insurance industry? I don't think so. And you're telling me that in the one State where we've already tried this, a mandate that you must buy health insurance…
Going back to my board here, why don't Democrats want to force United to have to compete with Aetna for the business of that little guy so that he or she can buy health insurance, tax-free, like Intel can or Motorola can or the Federal…





