As the gentleman understands the proposal being offered by Republicans, one of the key features is choice. That is, we allow people to pick from amongst a variety of plans that meet their own needs; and in addition at least it is my understanding that as the bill we passed and the legislation we are proposing and indeed the legislation being proposed by Governor Bush would give seniors the right to not only choose amongst various plans when they join but to make choices again down the line. If they are unhappy with the plan they pick, they could make a choice at a later point to switch plans. Is that not a feature?
John Shadegg: “As the gentleman understands the proposal being offered by Republicans, one of the key features is choice. That is, we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of choice in healthcare plans for seniors.
Share
More from John Shadegg
Ah, so it's Republicans who oppose this bill that are the pals of the health insurance industry? I don't think so. And you're telling me that in the one State where we've already tried this, a mandate that you must buy health insurance…
Oh, the cost went up. Wait, the cost went up? They have forced everybody in Massachusetts, like this bill would do, to buy a health insurance plan on the premise that the cost would go down. But in Massachusetts where they did it, the cost…
Wait, the gentleman's telling me that never before in Federal law have we ordered people to buy a particular product, that we don't do that in Federal law as a routine matter?
So the reason you wouldn't want to stand on the floor and vote for that Senate bill is not just because of the policy in it, it is because that bill will contain the Cornhusker Kickback, right?





