Well, as having been the chairman of the initiative drive who put it on the ballot and then pushed it over with the vote of 72 percent of the legislature supporting it, it has worked extremely well. Where we had seen a spate of 9 successive tax increases in a row, we have not seen a general tax increase since that measure was enacted. I would point out that the measure enacted in Arizona is much like the one we are proposing here; that is, it allows revenue neutral tax reform, so that if we want to change the code in some respect we can, so long as it is not a tax increase. And whenever in Arizona a tax increase is required, that is when the supermajority, two-thirds, is triggered, just as the language we are proposing here today would do.
John Shadegg: “Well, as having been the chairman of the initiative drive who put it on the ballot and then pushed it over with the vote…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the success of a tax reform initiative in Arizona and its implications for proposed legislation.
Share
More from John Shadegg
That's the IRS. The IRS is going to force you and me to buy health insurance from an approved health insurance company, federally approved health insurance. Maybe you can answer the question that is posited on this graphic: Why does the…
Because of one word difference? One word difference. The Senate has already passed the Senate bill, the House has to pass that exact bill word for word. It can't have one word missing?
An elaborate charade. Trickery. If the American people think we are engaged in trickery, why not engage in trickery.
So this would be the first Federal mandate saying you must buy a product because the Federal Government tells you you must buy a product?





