Certainly. And I think we will. Except, as you say, you're not sure if you understand what would be dilatory tactics. We're not sure if we understand and can't know now what we might consider to be a substantive amendment which you would view wasn't. And so I just want to confirm that the right of an individual Member on the minority side to object to the unanimous-consent agreement remains intact and hasn't been waived by any portion of this agreement. And I presume that's the understanding of the majority leader.
John Shadegg: “Certainly. And I think we will. Except, as you say, you're not sure if you understand what would be dilatory tactics.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the rights of minority members regarding unanimous-consent agreements.
Share
More from John Shadegg
An elaborate charade. Trickery. If the American people think we are engaged in trickery, why not engage in trickery.
I have spent a great deal of my life advocating for the victims of crime. It seems to me this is an outrage that exists in current law. The victims of crime should not be revictimized. In this case, American law does revictimize those…
No, we don't force people to do that. I guess we do say that if you want to drive in some places, you have to buy auto insurance to insure against damage to somebody else. Right?
Ah, so it's Republicans who oppose this bill that are the pals of the health insurance industry? I don't think so. And you're telling me that in the one State where we've already tried this, a mandate that you must buy health insurance…





