Certainly. And I think we will. Except, as you say, you're not sure if you understand what would be dilatory tactics. We're not sure if we understand and can't know now what we might consider to be a substantive amendment which you would view wasn't. And so I just want to confirm that the right of an individual Member on the minority side to object to the unanimous-consent agreement remains intact and hasn't been waived by any portion of this agreement. And I presume that's the understanding of the majority leader.
John Shadegg: “Certainly. And I think we will. Except, as you say, you're not sure if you understand what would be dilatory tactics.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the rights of minority members regarding unanimous-consent agreements.
Share
More from John Shadegg
Going back to my board here, why don't Democrats want to force United to have to compete with Aetna for the business of that little guy so that he or she can buy health insurance, tax-free, like Intel can or Motorola can or the Federal…
I kind of think the American people are fairly bright. I think they see through this. If you are deeming a bill passed in a rule, aren't you actually passing that bill and aren't you voting for that bill? And isn't this just a trick or a…
As I understand it, we first talked about a Republican idea of saying let everyone buy health insurance tax free. Republican idea. That would take care of the little guy who's paying an outrageous after-tax price for his health care. One…
It will contain Gator Aid. It apparently contains $100 million for a local hospital in Connecticut that Chris Dodd got in. It contains $1.1 billion for Medicaid in Vermont and Massachusetts. I guess not Arizona or Texas. Our States didn't…





