as I understand from discussions with the gentleman's staff, the concern he has is, I guess, two points. One is not with PM-10, which I think the gentleman would agree with me that funds be used under CMAQ to mitigate PM-10 pollution at this point; but as I understand it, the gentleman has some concern with whether or not PM-2.5 can be mitigated with these funds as the Senate is trying to do. Is that correct?
Discussing concerns about funding for PM-10 and PM-2.5 pollution mitigation.
Share
More from John Shadegg
As I understand it, we first talked about a Republican idea of saying let everyone buy health insurance tax free. Republican idea. That would take care of the little guy who's paying an outrageous after-tax price for his health care. One…
The gentleman started by commenting about the shutting down of the switchboards and whether or not individual citizens could get through to their Member of Congress today and express their feelings, and I would suggest right now maybe…
Oh, the cost went up. Wait, the cost went up? They have forced everybody in Massachusetts, like this bill would do, to buy a health insurance plan on the premise that the cost would go down. But in Massachusetts where they did it, the cost…
I believe most people across America know that we have been debating health care reform for almost a year now--actually, quite frankly, a little over a year now. And I think most Americans agree with me and probably with almost everybody…
Other voices in this conversation
