I oppose this motion to instruct, and I urge my colleagues to defeat it. I think it is important that we look at precisely what the motion to instruct does. There are two pieces to it... steps to begin meetings have in fact been agreed to, making the first point of the motion to instruct moot. I guess I would add on that point that I myself agree with the concern that the conferees should meet and that we should begin the process, because I wholeheartedly agree it is critically important work. But the second portion of the motion to instruct is the portion of the motion I think our colleagues should be concerned about and, quite frankly, which is the portion of the motion to instruct which makes it technically flawed. And that is that we instruct the conferees that they insist that H.R. 2723 be included in the conference report. What that means is that we insist on the House position and the House position only.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a motion to instruct conferees during a House floor debate.
Share
More from John Shadegg
In the system today, your employer picks the plan, and the plan picks the doctor. You don't get to pick the plan, and you don't get to pick the doctor. If the plan or the doctor abuses you, you can't fire them.
As I understand it, we first talked about a Republican idea of saying let everyone buy health insurance tax free. Republican idea. That would take care of the little guy who's paying an outrageous after-tax price for his health care. One…
A health care decision ought to be made by the patient, the family, and the physician.
I think you make a fascinating point. Clearly, the American people get it. They believe the health care system delivers quality care, but a lot of people are left out. Indeed, many of my friends in Arizona point out, way too many people…





