It seems to me, first of all, the most important premise is to establish the fact that for those of us who oppose national testing, our opponents on the other side, that is the President and Secretary Riley and the educational experts and bureaucrats in the Education Department, would argue that if we oppose national testing, it is because we do not care about education. Let me ask the gentleman, you indicated you had a long history in public education. Do you believe that those of us who oppose a one-size-fits-all national test; that is, that a Federal Government mathematics test, written inside the Beltway, in Washington, D.C., is a bad idea. Do you believe those of us that think that is a bad idea do not care about education?
John Shadegg: “It seems to me, first of all, the most important premise is to establish the fact that for those of us who oppose…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing opposition to national testing in education policy.
Share
More from John Shadegg
Ah, so it's Republicans who oppose this bill that are the pals of the health insurance industry? I don't think so. And you're telling me that in the one State where we've already tried this, a mandate that you must buy health insurance…
So this would be the first Federal mandate saying you must buy a product because the Federal Government tells you you must buy a product?
That's the IRS. The IRS is going to force you and me to buy health insurance from an approved health insurance company, federally approved health insurance. Maybe you can answer the question that is posited on this graphic: Why does the…
No, we don't force people to do that. I guess we do say that if you want to drive in some places, you have to buy auto insurance to insure against damage to somebody else. Right?





