It seems to me, first of all, the most important premise is to establish the fact that for those of us who oppose national testing, our opponents on the other side, that is the President and Secretary Riley and the educational experts and bureaucrats in the Education Department, would argue that if we oppose national testing, it is because we do not care about education. Let me ask the gentleman, you indicated you had a long history in public education. Do you believe that those of us who oppose a one-size-fits-all national test; that is, that a Federal Government mathematics test, written inside the Beltway, in Washington, D.C., is a bad idea. Do you believe those of us that think that is a bad idea do not care about education?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing opposition to national testing in education policy.
Share
More from John Shadegg
I think you make a fascinating point. Clearly, the American people get it. They believe the health care system delivers quality care, but a lot of people are left out. Indeed, many of my friends in Arizona point out, way too many people…
So AARP likes it and PhRMA, which are big drug companies, like it. All of the big insurance companies like it because you're mandated to buy their product. And there is no public option competing with them, and they don't have to compete…
I kind of think the American people are fairly bright. I think they see through this. If you are deeming a bill passed in a rule, aren't you actually passing that bill and aren't you voting for that bill? And isn't this just a trick or a…
Federal legislation already passed in 2006 offered all 50 States some Federal money to help set up the State high-risk pool to care for those people with preexisting conditions and offered Federal money to subsidize or to underwrite the…





