The goal of this sense of Congress amendment is, in fact, to direct the resources that we have for disabled children to those disabled children, and to make sure that we are putting into the program those kids, those young people, those children in our schools most in need. The reality is this is an incredibly important program that I take great pride that the Republican Congress has funded at an exceedingly higher level than it was in the past, but those resources need to go to the children most in need. I urge Members to support it.
John Shadegg: “The goal of this sense of Congress amendment is, in fact, to direct the resources that we have for disabled children to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of directing resources to disabled children during a congressional debate.
Share
More from John Shadegg
Oh, the cost went up. Wait, the cost went up? They have forced everybody in Massachusetts, like this bill would do, to buy a health insurance plan on the premise that the cost would go down. But in Massachusetts where they did it, the cost…
It seems to me morally indefensible, morally indefensible to say to the American people, If you work for a big, big, big employer--like you and I do, the Federal Government--or like we'll say, General Motors or Intel or Motorola or AT&T or…
So this would be the first Federal mandate saying you must buy a product because the Federal Government tells you you must buy a product?
Ah, so it's Republicans who oppose this bill that are the pals of the health insurance industry? I don't think so. And you're telling me that in the one State where we've already tried this, a mandate that you must buy health insurance…





