America is fighting with a hand tied behind its back. We simply do not have enough troops in Iraq, and we need them now. We had just enough troops to control Samarra and secure ourselves, but not enough to bring lasting stability or security. Two things are to blame for our predicament. The first reason is that we did not have enough troops in Samarra; the second, because of a lack of troops, American military leaders, those on the ground, those engaged in this fight, are forced to make a choice between mission objectives and self-preservation. All too often that choice that they are forced into is protection of our troops, not mission objectives. Let me tell you how he concluded, because I think it is pertinent to this debate, where what we seek to do is to disapprove the surge of 20,000 troops. I believe that the safety of America depends on the outcome of the battle in the streets of Baghdad.
John Shadegg: “America is fighting with a hand tied behind its back. We simply do not have enough troops in Iraq, and we need them now.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for more troops in Iraq during a debate on military strategy.
Share
More from John Shadegg
Going back to my board here, why don't Democrats want to force United to have to compete with Aetna for the business of that little guy so that he or she can buy health insurance, tax-free, like Intel can or Motorola can or the Federal…
It's a third-party pay system that exists right now. It does not work when your employer controls your health care plan. It will not work when the government controls your health care plan. It makes all the sense in the world to let people…
In the system today, your employer picks the plan, and the plan picks the doctor. You don't get to pick the plan, and you don't get to pick the doctor. If the plan or the doctor abuses you, you can't fire them.
I think the health insurance industry in America has cut a fat hog. I think, quite frankly, they have failed the American people.





