Secondly, a company may continue to make contributions to such an employee stock ownership plan, an ESOP, for purposes of meeting the safe harbor provisions of the nondiscrimination test established by section 401(k), and that such contributions would not be subject to the diversification requirement established by this legislation.
John Shadegg: “Secondly, a company may continue to make contributions to such an employee stock ownership plan, an ESOP, for purposes…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing provisions related to employee stock ownership plans during a legislative session.
Share
More from John Shadegg
An elaborate charade. Trickery. If the American people think we are engaged in trickery, why not engage in trickery.
That's the IRS. The IRS is going to force you and me to buy health insurance from an approved health insurance company, federally approved health insurance. Maybe you can answer the question that is posited on this graphic: Why does the…
It seems to me morally indefensible, morally indefensible to say to the American people, If you work for a big, big, big employer--like you and I do, the Federal Government--or like we'll say, General Motors or Intel or Motorola or AT&T or…
I kind of think the American people are fairly bright. I think they see through this. If you are deeming a bill passed in a rule, aren't you actually passing that bill and aren't you voting for that bill? And isn't this just a trick or a…





