I know that he believes deeply, as I do, that we have an obligation, having thrown out Saddam, as was needed to be done, a terrible dictator, to now help the Iraqi people. I think his illustrations of what we have done have helped. Quite frankly, when I do these special orders, I like to have them be a discussion between several people, back and forth. Stunningly, we have so many people here tonight that it is almost not possible to follow that form. One of our colleagues is the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Weldon). He is here, and I know he feels passionately that we need to rebuild Iraq, that the President is going in the right direction and that it is indeed a mandate in history, that this has lifelong consequences for our war against terror.
John Shadegg: “I know that he believes deeply, as I do, that we have an obligation, having thrown out Saddam, as was needed to be done…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the obligation to help the Iraqi people after the removal of Saddam Hussein.
Share
More from John Shadegg
I have spent a great deal of my life advocating for the victims of crime. It seems to me this is an outrage that exists in current law. The victims of crime should not be revictimized. In this case, American law does revictimize those…
It seems to me morally indefensible, morally indefensible to say to the American people, If you work for a big, big, big employer--like you and I do, the Federal Government--or like we'll say, General Motors or Intel or Motorola or AT&T or…
Because of one word difference? One word difference. The Senate has already passed the Senate bill, the House has to pass that exact bill word for word. It can't have one word missing?
So the reason you wouldn't want to stand on the floor and vote for that Senate bill is not just because of the policy in it, it is because that bill will contain the Cornhusker Kickback, right?





