It is often important in a debate to have a red herring. If we do not want to talk about the real issue in a piece of legislation, talk about something that we can imply is involved in the legislation but really is not, a red herring. In this debate today, sadly, we have a red herring. The red herring is the argument raised on the other side that this measure will make it harder to close tax loopholes. Member after Member after Member after Member of the other side has gotten up and said this is the Tax Loophole Protection Act. This will make it impossible to close tax loopholes. This is a bad idea because it will make it impossible to reach corporate tax loopholes. Sadly, it appears that those Members either have read it and know that to be false, or have not bothered to read the language that we are voting on. Simply stated, this measure will make it no harder to close tax loopholes.
Editor's note · Context
Debating the implications of a measure related to tax loopholes.
Share
More from John Shadegg
It will contain Gator Aid. It apparently contains $100 million for a local hospital in Connecticut that Chris Dodd got in. It contains $1.1 billion for Medicaid in Vermont and Massachusetts. I guess not Arizona or Texas. Our States didn't…
That's the IRS. The IRS is going to force you and me to buy health insurance from an approved health insurance company, federally approved health insurance. Maybe you can answer the question that is posited on this graphic: Why does the…
Or maybe even a small doctor's office. If their employer doesn't give them employer-paid health care coverage, here's what we do the little guy. Here's what we do to the least among us. We say, Oh, you really ought to be insured, but we're…
I have spent a great deal of my life advocating for the victims of crime. It seems to me this is an outrage that exists in current law. The victims of crime should not be revictimized. In this case, American law does revictimize those…





