The Republican alternative is to give every single American family, every single one, the ability to buy a health care plan of their choice, not just the rich, not just the poor, but even those who don't respond to a government request that they enroll. We want to put them in a position to buy the health care they need by their choice from the doctor they choose. That's not good enough for the other side. They want to expand government programs that in the tragic story of Deamonte Driver resulted in the death of a 12-year-old boy from a problem that started as a toothache.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing health care options and government programs during a debate.
Share
More from John Shadegg
Your idea is we should empower patients to be able to pick their plans and to be able to pick their doctors, which we could do by, number one, letting those Americans who can afford it but who don't get employer-provided care buy health…
In the system today, your employer picks the plan, and the plan picks the doctor. You don't get to pick the plan, and you don't get to pick the doctor. If the plan or the doctor abuses you, you can't fire them.
An elaborate charade. Trickery. If the American people think we are engaged in trickery, why not engage in trickery.
That's what we call defensive medicine, which means a doctor defending himself in advance or practicing defensive medicine because he is afraid he's going to get sued and has to be able to respond to that suit.





