I know the gentleman would agree with me that this legislation today, the Republican legislation before us today, takes important steps toward solving these problems, but that there is also agreement on the part of the gentleman and on the part of our Republican leadership that the best long-term solution would be to adopt reforms which make it possible, and indeed, encourage, individuals, whether they are employees of a company or the self-employed, or for that matter unemployed, to purchase their own health insurance without having to go through their employer and get the same tax advantage as their employer currently gets under the law.
John Shadegg: “I know the gentleman would agree with me that this legislation today, the Republican legislation before us today, takes…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing health insurance reform and tax advantages during a legislative session.
Share
More from John Shadegg
So the reason you wouldn't want to stand on the floor and vote for that Senate bill is not just because of the policy in it, it is because that bill will contain the Cornhusker Kickback, right?
No, we don't force people to do that. I guess we do say that if you want to drive in some places, you have to buy auto insurance to insure against damage to somebody else. Right?
Because of one word difference? One word difference. The Senate has already passed the Senate bill, the House has to pass that exact bill word for word. It can't have one word missing?
Ah, so it's Republicans who oppose this bill that are the pals of the health insurance industry? I don't think so. And you're telling me that in the one State where we've already tried this, a mandate that you must buy health insurance…





