Reclaiming my time, without commenting on the specifics of the litigation because I am not familiar with each of them, my answer to that would be no. What we seek to do by this reduction of 50 percent and terminating it in the second year is to give it an orderly time to phase out what I just mentioned are, I think, the worthwhile parts of this program, to retain that.
Discussing a proposed reduction and phase-out of a program during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Jim Kolbe
This is the moment for the United States and Europe to negotiate the boldest, broadest trade and investment agreement we have ever contemplated since World War II.
The Salvadoran people are wonderful people. I have known many of them in my own community and had one of them who came as a refugee from Salvador as an intern working for me and is today one of my very close friends. They are wonderful…
I rise in support of this by conference agreement on trade promotion authority. We have traveled a long and difficult road to arrive at this moment. For 8 years, American leadership and national interests have been sitting on the…
I want to talk about this amendment which does affect both the defense chapter of this supplemental as well as the foreign assistance chapter. The supplemental bill before the House today has the same level as the President's request for…
Other voices in this conversation
