Unfortunately, the misguided effort to enshrine family law into the Constitution of the United States comes from this side of the aisle. Mr. Speaker, the very process by which this bill is brought before us today is an affront to this institution. It was not considered by any committee of the House. It is not brought to the floor by the chairman of that committee. Rather, it is brought by the Republican leadership, who decided to take upon themselves to do the work of the committees and their chairmen. Moreover, this very same legislation was considered in the Senate and did not even achieve a majority vote, much less the required two-thirds for a constitutional amendment. Why then are we rushing to judgment here today? What is the compelling reason to consider this now? Eleven States have proposed constitutional amendments on the ballot this November which would define marriage in their own States as being between a man and a woman. While I might disagree with the actions of the voters in my State or any State considering such an amendment to their constitution, that is their prerogative. For better than 200 years, family law has exclusively been the domain of the States.
Jim Kolbe: “Unfortunately, the misguided effort to enshrine family law into the Constitution of the United States comes from this…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the process and implications of a proposed constitutional amendment on marriage.
Share
More from Jim Kolbe
what is the time remaining on both sides? The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Arizona has 18\1/2\ minutes remaining, the gentleman from Massachusetts has 16 minutes remaining.
regrettably, I would concede the point of order. The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman concedes the point of order, the point of order is sustained, and that provision of the bill is stricken.
let me just say once again I think this would be a very wrong-headed amendment, the wrong thing for us to do. This is not symbolic. This cuts all the ESF funds that we provide to the country of Mexico, which is, relative to most of our…
I withdraw my point of order on the amendment and I would allow Mr. Crowley to claim the time in opposition. The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman withdraws his reservation of a point of order. The gentleman from New York claims the time in…





