Mr. Speaker, let me just, if I might, respond to a few of the comments that were made by the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Coburn). Let me say that I have the greatest respect for the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Coburn). He has been the conscience of this House, he has been a fiscal hawk, and he has forced those of us on the appropriations committees, and all the committees, to answer questions in a way that I think we need to have answers, not only to our colleagues but to the American people. So I salute him for the work that he has done and I appreciate it. It may not have always have made my days easier, but it is okay. I think it makes for a better bill in the long-run. But if I might, let me just talk about a couple of things that he mentioned. He talked about the fact that this is $240 million over last year. In my opening remarks, the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Coburn) was not on the floor at that time, but I noted that that $240 million, which is less than a 2 percent increase over the current year, is considerably short of what we would need--$600 million--to maintain current levels.
Editor's note · Context
Responding to comments made by Mr. Coburn regarding appropriations and fiscal responsibility.
Share
More from Jim Kolbe
It has been a vocal advocate for elevating development as a national security pillar equal to that of defense and diplomacy.
I do stand here today because of my role as chairman of the Subcommittee on Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs, understanding the interrelationship between our foreign policy and our economic policy. Offering the…
This is the moment for the United States and Europe to negotiate the boldest, broadest trade and investment agreement we have ever contemplated since World War II.
I understand how strongly she feels about this issue. I also feel strongly about the people of the Ukraine and their rights to have a free and an open society. Mr. Chairman, this bill does not signal an abandonment of Ukraine. Let me note…





