this is one heck of a corrosive proposal, and I rise in steely opposition to it. The notion that we are victims of predatory and illegal dumping is a corrosive idea. We are told that the only way that this practice is going to cease is if we limit or ban imports to some kind of an arbitrary level set in 1994, and that is very rusty logic for a number of reasons. So let me focus on a couple of facts. Fact one: U.S. law provides clear trade remedies for industries that are harmed by dumping. In fact, the steel industry has already filed and won anti-dumping cases against Japan and Brazil, and it has negotiated a voluntary restraint agreement with Russia. The results of that are dramatically shown in this chart which shows imports from those three countries subject to investigations have dropped for hot rolled steel products. This drop over the last three months has been 98 percent, 97 percent in the case of Brazil and about 60 percent in the case of Japan, or more than that. So it has been almost cut to nothing. Even as we debate, there are antidumping cases proceeding against France, India, Indonesia, Italy, Korea, Macedonia. More than a third of the 300 antidumping and countervailing duty orders address steel. So here we can see in three months' time the reduction of hot-rolled steel products from all countries, from a total of 1.4 million tons per month in November of 1998 to 437,000 tons today.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a proposal related to trade remedies and steel imports.
Share
More from Jim Kolbe
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 4967 will end years of frustration for colleges and universities, frustration made worse by the terrorist attacks of September 11. The Border Commuter Student Act is simple in its purpose. It is to allow U.S. border…
If there is a positive outcome to it, it's probably going to be that, but it's going to be employers that are going to be saying we need to resolve this issue.
It has been a vocal advocate for elevating development as a national security pillar equal to that of defense and diplomacy.
The law as it written down as relates to employers is an unenforceable law because it says that employers have to have three pieces of documentation.





