I believe that the amendment that was crafted before and as offered has the effect of actually stopping any trucks from coming into the United States. That is the intent of it, I believe, to make sure they do not get into the United States. So now that amendment not having been made in order under the rules, I would say to my good friend from Wisconsin, I think we are seeing the true intent here. It is interest groups. Look at the people that are supporting this amendment. Look at the people asking for this. It is groups that do not want trucks coming into the United States, period.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to truck regulations.
Share
More from Jim Kolbe
So many of them have back home taken a position that it's not only, no, but heck no. We won't do anything that isn't border security.
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 4967 will end years of frustration for colleges and universities, frustration made worse by the terrorist attacks of September 11. The Border Commuter Student Act is simple in its purpose. It is to allow U.S. border…
If you fold it into the State Department completely, what you are doing is you are subjecting it to the political considerations.
I would use the word ``direct'' rather than ``allocate.'' We do not earmark. We have a direction that they make this money available, and they look carefully at the mitigation issues in South Asia. I believe it accomplishes exactly what…





