I thank the gentlelady for accepting the amendment. Some have asked, Why do this if there's no intention to earmark the program? Why do we need this language? Unfortunately, in the past, with programs that have been adopted like this, competitive grant programs, we have said and promised in Congress that we won't earmark those funds, and we've come and earmarked them. A good example is FEMA's Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program that was put in place. It was not to be earmarked. It was a grant program like this one. Yet in 2007, nearly half of the funds for the program were earmarked. I just want to make sure that they aren't in this program as well. So I thank the gentlelady for accepting the amendment. I urge its adoption. I yield back the balance of my time.
Jeff Flake: “I thank the gentlelady for accepting the amendment. Some have asked, Why do this if there's no intention to earmark the…”
Editor's note · Context
Flake discusses the importance of preventing earmarks in grant programs.
Share
More from Jeff Flake
No doubt. No doubt. The president has particular, you know, sway over Republican voters, that subset of a subset that controls primaries.
There is no two-state solution in Cyprus. It needs to be a bizonal, bicommunal federation negotiated between the parties.
I will. I was pleased to see after the December visit by Erdogan to Cyprus that the United States Government spoke out, as did the U.N., that any of the action that was contemplated with Varosha, for example, would violate Security Council…
You know, any fiscal conservative, any conservative Republican knows that the best government is divided government when it comes to limited government.





