I would simply reiterate what we are talking about here. This is a charter school that, although it has been spoken of as serving military families, it has no more of a mission to serve military families, I would suggest, than the school that my kids go to. There are military families there. But I would not presume to give an earmark to that school simply because military families might attend that school. There is nothing in the literature that we have been able to find anywhere in this school that has any specific purpose to serve military families.
Jeff Flake: “I would simply reiterate what we are talking about here. This is a charter school that, although it has been spoken of…”
On the recordAugust 4, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the appropriateness of earmarks for a charter school serving military families.
Share
More from Jeff Flake
Jul 26, 2021
There is no two-state solution in Cyprus. It needs to be a bizonal, bicommunal federation negotiated between the parties.
Jul 26, 2021
When people say you guys talk but do not do anything, this committee and the Congress and the administration did.
Jul 26, 2021
We need to make clear that that is inconsistent with democratic values and inconsistent with commitments that have been made.
Jul 26, 2021
I will. I was pleased to see after the December visit by Erdogan to Cyprus that the United States Government spoke out, as did the U.N., that any of the action that was contemplated with Varosha, for example, would violate Security Council…





