I'm wondering, in the report that accompanied the bill, it mentioned that the earmark was to go to the Center for Instrumented Critical Infrastructure, but the certification letter says that it's going to go to that but the earmark should actually go to Concurrent Technology Corporation. Which is it?
Questioning the allocation of an earmark during a discussion on a bill.
Share
More from Jeff Flake
I will. I was pleased to see after the December visit by Erdogan to Cyprus that the United States Government spoke out, as did the U.N., that any of the action that was contemplated with Varosha, for example, would violate Security Council…
Ankara has had at least a transactional relationship with Russia on a number of issues.
These CAATSA sanctions will not be lifted until they have disposed of the current system they have.
Other voices in this conversation
