this amendment is a little different from the others. The others would strike funding from the bill. This would simply redirect funding to the same account from which it was drawn. This amendment would redirect $3 million from the Lewis Center for Educational Research to the Family Advocacy Programs in the Operations and Maintenance account. Mr. Chairman, it seems that we are debating the Labor-HHS bill rather than the Defense appropriations bill. Why is there a $3 million earmark in the bill for an organization with a stated goal of providing ``an opportunity for students to experience real science; to learn that science is an ongoing process, not just memorizing facts?'' I am referring, of course, to this earmark for the Lewis Center for Educational Research. This is becoming somewhat of an annual earmark. In fact, according to the Citizens Against Government Waste database, this educational center has received earmarks in past Defense appropriation bills ranging from $2.5 million to $3.5 million in every fiscal year since 2003.
Jeff Flake: “this amendment is a little different from the others. The others would strike funding from the bill. This would simply…”
On the recordAugust 4, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to funding for the Lewis Center for Educational Research during Defense appropriations debate.
Share
More from Jeff Flake
Dec 19, 2018
I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to immediate consideration of Calendar No. 393, S. 2644. I further ask that the committee-reported substitute amendment be agreed to, the bill, as amended, be considered read a third time and…
Jan 1, 2019
I wasn't surprised by the tweet, but anyway, I thought it was a great op-ed that was written. I think it said things that need to continually be said. And so I applaud Mitt Romney for saying that.
Jan 25, 2021
It really is driving normal, regular, rational people from the Republican Party and we can't afford to lose many more.





