I would have hoped that the sponsor of the amendment, which I believe is the Speaker of the House, would have come here to defend it or talk more about it. That was a nice description, but again, the point isn't whether this is a worthy program or not or whether or not we need science teachers. I've had some rather dull ones as well, and I would rather have ones that are taught well and can teach well. But this museum has $12 million in revenue. This is 300,000 additional dollars given by the Federal Government. Why are we doing this? It's not because it's needed. It's because somebody can. I would submit that when we are running a deficit like we are in this country and we have the debt like we do, why in the world are we doing this? What possible nexus is there for the Federal Government to come in and supplant private dollars with taxpayer dollars? With that, I would urge adoption of the amendment. Madam Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
Jeff Flake: “I would have hoped that the sponsor of the amendment, which I believe is the Speaker of the House, would have come here…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the funding of a museum and the use of federal taxpayer dollars.
Share
More from Jeff Flake
They have pushed back against Soviet--Russian aggression in Ukraine and with Georgia.
I rise for the third time in the past 2 months to defend the integrity of our political process by defending the ongoing investigation led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. The continuity of this investigation is critical to upholding…
I do hope that somebody runs to remind Republicans what it means to be conservative and to remind the country what it means to be decent, as well.
I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to immediate consideration of Calendar No. 393, S. 2644. I further ask that the committee-reported substitute amendment be agreed to, the bill, as amended, be considered read a third time and…





