the day after the House passed the Labor- HHS spending bill containing more than 2,000 earmarks, we got a look at the Defense bill. What we're finding is troubling to say the least. Again, there are more than 2,000 earmarks in this bill, a bill that is intended for the military. Now, we all know that earmarks draw funds away from more urgent priorities. Nowhere is this more clear than with the military spending bill. Simply put, every dollar that Congress has earmarked in the Defense bill is a dollar that troops won't have for critical equipment. What's so important that it diverts money away from soldiers? Well, air-dropped into this conference report and this Defense appropriation bill, $3 million for a golf program for kids. This earmark might be par for the course in any other bill, but in the Defense bill, it's clearly indefensible. I don't believe that earmarks like this represent the sentiments of the country when it comes to military spending, and I urge my colleagues to reject the bill until the earmarks are removed.
Jeff Flake: “the day after the House passed the Labor- HHS spending bill containing more than 2,000 earmarks, we got a look at the…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing earmarks in the Defense bill during a floor speech.
Share
More from Jeff Flake
the alarm among Republicans in the Senate privately is palpable. They feel the President may be able to navigate issues like the peaceful transfer of power, Proud Boys, white supremacy, and somehow through relentlessness and shamelessness…
Ankara has had at least a transactional relationship with Russia on a number of issues.
I expect we will stay in regular touch, and I look forward to finding ways that we can continue to work together on making sure that the United States remains not just a nation of interests, but a nation of values and where our foreign…
You know, any fiscal conservative, any conservative Republican knows that the best government is divided government when it comes to limited government.





