This is a lifetime appointment, and this is said to be a deliberative body. In the interest of due diligence and fairness, her claims must be fully aired and considered.
Editor's note · Context
Flake emphasizes the importance of thoroughly considering the claims made during the Supreme Court nomination process.
Share & report
More from Jeff Flake
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar No. 503, S. 3029. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title. The senior assistant legislative clerk read as…
Just look at what has happened. The attorney general has been fired. And oversight for the investigation has been taken from the deputy attorney general where it belonged.
I ask unanimous consent that the bill be read a third time and passed and that the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The bill (S. 3509) was ordered…
I know of no further debate on the bill. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The bill having been read the third time, the question is, Shall the bill pass? The bill (H.R. 4854) was passed.





