Political Quotes

On the recordMay 13, 2010
I believe this amendment is noncontroversial in nature. It merely adds sense of Congress language to the bill expressing that, ``retaining graduate-level talent trained at American universities in STEM fields is critical to enhancing the competitiveness of American businesses.'' According to the National Science Foundation, foreign students receive about half of all doctorates in engineering, mathematics, computer sciences, physics, and economics that are awarded in the United States. Unfortunately, growing backlogs in processing applications hamper the flexibility of U.S. employers to hire foreign-born talent with advanced degrees from American universities. These hurdles affect even doctoral graduates in STEM fields trained at U.S. universities, who either return home or seek employment in a country with a more welcoming immigration system. The loss of Ph.D. talent, trained at U.S. institutions and due to immigration redtape, to our competitors makes little sense, and it harms our economy. Researchers at Duke University and the University of California- Berkeley found that from 1995 to 2005, more than a quarter of engineering and technology companies started in the U.S. had at least one foreign-born founder, and in 2006, these companies employed 450,000 workers and produced $52 billion in sales. This amendment is supported by COMPETE America, American Council on International Personnel, and TechAmerica. I urge its adoption. This is important.
Said by
Jeff Flake
Republican · Arizona

Editor's note · Context

The speaker addresses the importance of retaining STEM talent trained at U.S. universities and the challenges posed by immigration processes.

Share

More from Jeff Flake

Jul 26, 2021

Turkey currently detains more journalists than any country but China.

congress.gov
Jul 26, 2021

When people say you guys talk but do not do anything, this committee and the Congress and the administration did.

congress.gov
Jan 1, 2019

if you just dismiss all of that and just talk politics, at some point here soon, Republicans are going to have to decide whether or not they want to be tethered to the president politically.

transcripts.cnn.com
Oct 23, 2020

We can't vote for Trump because four more years of him, we won't have a Republican Party that's op-ed. It's four years too late. The Republican Party has to pay for this along with Trump.

msnbc.com

Other voices in this conversation